The domino theory of #neurodiversity / Those who would remain society's voiceover for the foreseeable
• https://www.sverige2.earth/complexify / http://complexify.me | #complexifyme
Background
The last week I began what I hope will be a process of permanent, final and determined rescue.
I can't give any more details for privacy reasons but I can say it involves a human brain radically misunderstood and treated with tools that involved an outside-in inspectorial approach — typical of latterday (though not original) #it-#tech, as well as a wider approach in all modern business, educative, medical, criminal justice and government processes.
The implications of this outside-in way of accessing human-related data are dreadful:
• https://gb2earth.com/six / #sixpositions on #it-#tech
And here, too:
• https://www.secrecy.plus/spt-it / http://spt-it | the rationale for new #secrecypositive platforms | #digitalpencilandpaper
And they're the reason why we haven't yet made apps with these philosophies:
• https://gb2earth.com/humans | where #patients become #subjectmatterexperts
The first outcome
In one week I slowly began to change the experience an often distressed human brain has lived all their life. And all I did was speak and speak and speak on the terms that the brain clearly understood and valued since forever.
On Friday something astounding took place: a transformation of a totally alchemical nature.
:-)
My question
My question then being: why is this so hard for society to achieve more often?
And why was it not possible for it to be done with me way back in 2002-2003?
• https://gb2earth.com/research/citizenx | #citizenx #neoterrorismontheindividual
• https://gb2earth.com/citizenx | the resource hub for #citizenx
Why, in my case, did a whole #uk #securitystate find it easier to spend the resources of decades on coercing and inhibiting my own human brain and many others like me instead of channelling and enabling the skillsets involved for the benefit of a wider #nationalsecurity?
Why?
Why indeed ...
Well.
The answer
I think the answer is clear: it's the domino theory of #neurodiverse #thinking platforms and tools. Where one admits just once that something can be done to make the world a fundamentally better place for an imaginative and hugely creative human brain, in just the space of a week too, everything is questioned. Everything is questioned and everything is questionable. All the basics and foundational principles of democracy's #governmentalities — to quote from #foucault — begin to shake and slowly disintegrate:
• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governmentality
This is why #neurodiversity as a concept and even philosophy feels to those who prefer to self-define as #neurotypical to be more a dogma: it opens unstoppable floodgates for those who believe they have a right to be the voiceover of what our societies choose to do and claim and proclaim.
And my ideas around #intuition and #intuitionvalidation are a simple support to such actions as these that amplify the number of people we may rightfully define as #neurodiverse. Perhaps much closer to the 100 percent of humans that we all are than we might ever imagine.
One reason I sense why those who wish to REMAIN society's voiceover for the foreseeable have been particularly active in preventing me from delivering on my mission of forging the #intuitionvalidationengine and the wider concept of a #gutenbergofintuitivethinking into a true #generalpurposetechnology — ie the original #gpt (email, the wheel, the printing-press, and so on) — capable of changing everything.
For the better, I assert ... yes. For the better, for sure.
