The two points below are now the position I hold:
INVEST-SEC is where we develop new software architectures from scratch, to plumb the necessary depths of all intuitive and arational thinking a human being is capable of, with the desire to be able not only to reverse-engineer cold cases but forward-engineer bad-actor intentions before they have a chance to implement them.
INVEST-ALL, meantime, is where we take the philosophies of INVEST-SEC, but always built on existing security philosophies of total surveillance/surveillance tech, where the admin and user roles are separate and quite distinct.
The GB 2 Earth “INVEST hub”
INVEST-ALL except sec
As already discussed on the GB 2 Earth “INVEST hub” page, the type of technology we propose using when aiming to disrupt any sector must never be indiscriminately unleashed onto a market, without considering the downsides and, indeed, damage such actions may lead to.
We only have to see the outcomes in the past twelve months of the actions of those who promote generative AI at the expense of copyright owners, creators, content editors and producers, and then again simply the law itself, to realise the dangers of being so irresponsible.
What the “INVEST-ALL except sec” page is about
This page is aimed at all investors and potential clients of all sectors of human endeavour where secrecy-positive architectures and platforms could deliver leaps in human thinking.
An example roadmap here discusses climate change:
Some selected slides from the slide-deck in question are below.
As we can see, the technologies I am proposing almost certainly need developing — and sooner rather than later — because our enemies already avail themselves of similarly creative cognitive warfare thinking-spaces.
But what about other similarly complex problems in need of different ways of harnessing deep human intelligences in ways we’ve never proposed doing before?
How can we square the circle of expanding our capacity to think ourselves to a better collective future, without the bad actors out there using the very same tools to detonate our attempts at self-improvement? Problems such as the above-discussed challenges of climate change, and other geopolitical dislocations — some natural, some human-made …
I think it’s possible, and mainly because of the four levels of privacy to secrecy we propose.
Have a look at a different selection of slides from the selfsame climate change slide-deck.
In these that follow, developed last year in Stockholm Sweden, I had attempted to address reticences and concerns I sensed would be felt by the British authorities, in respect of the security philosophies I was suggesting might be needed. A phased introduction from across the whole spectrum of privacy to secrecy might have been sufficient to address these concerns.
In the light of the disaster generative AI’s introduction over the past twelve months has proved to be, however, I’m now inclined to separate INVEST-SEC from INVEST-ALL completely.
The two points below are now the position I hold:
INVEST-SEC is where we develop new software architectures from scratch, to plumb the necessary depths of all intuitive and arational thinking a human being is capable of, with the desire to be able not only to reverse-engineer cold cases but forward-engineer bad-actor intentions before they have a chance to implement them.
INVEST-ALL, meantime, is where we take the philosophies of INVEST-SEC, but always built on existing security philosophies of total surveillance/surveillance tech, where the admin and user roles are separate and quite distinct.
The full climate change slide-deck can be found and downloaded from here:
The four workstreams section, as below, can be found and downloaded from here:
The “INVEST-ALL” investor and client slide-deck
Note: this slide-deck is being developed and will appear here shortly.