INVEST-EXAMPLE
EWOR April 2024
TWO DOCUMENTS FROM THE FINAL “EWOR” SUBMISSION ITSELF
Document 1: a 2-minute video
The brief 2-minute video requested by EWOR, explaining why one might want to be an entrepreneur, some of the outcomes expected from the proposal, and related matters.
Document 2: the submission slide-deck
THE LINKEDIN POST, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION
#secrecyplus: "solve a complex world"
Taken originally from the LinkedIn post below, and slightly amended for republication here as a historical record:
What follows is what I wrote a couple of weeks ago, prior to making a submission to the #startup programme EWOR.
Today, 7th of April 2024, I received confirmation that my project would not be proceeding to the next stage.
I republish the post here as a matter of historical record.
Something I'm now actively working on, having been invited to submit for funding very shortly.
The final application and documents go in this weekend.
gb2earth.com/invest | the #investhub for the #secrecyplus: "solve a complex world" proposal
The draft #investor slide-deck, also found with other decks on the above page linked to, can be found attached below.
Finally, for the moment I've divided the proposals in two.
The rationale is here, and reproduced below:
gb2earth.com/invest-sec | #investsec
"The two points below are now the position I hold:
INVEST-SEC is where we develop new software architectures from scratch, to plumb the necessary depths of all intuitive and arational thinking a human being is capable of, with the desire to be able not only to reverse-engineer cold cases but forward-engineer bad-actor intentions before they have a chance to implement them.
INVEST-ALL, meantime, is where we take the philosophies of INVEST-SEC, but always built on existing security philosophies of total surveillance/surveillance tech, where the admin and user roles are separate and quite distinct."
Further down, I argue:
"As we can see, the technologies I am proposing almost certainly need developing — and sooner rather than later — because our enemies already avail themselves of similarly creative cognitive warfare thinking-spaces.
The slides that follow can be found in the wider slide-deck that discusses the actions of Putin’s Russia’s terrorist nation-state over the years: definitely acting longitudinally.
The full slide deck can be found here:
The slides below from that deck can be drilled down to here:
They narrate an event in the war that Putin’s Russia is waging on Ukraine and all Western democracies & related, which shows how an enabled intuition on the battlefield can outwit the brute force of machines.
And if with machines, what about IT-tech?
Stories of Chinese and Russian hackers, using their innate human intelligence to tweak and repurpose, with the tools and arms of cognitive warfare, now abound in both the specialised and non-specialised media.
We need to begin to get dirty with our tech too, just like the Russians and Chinese, and in similar historical ways to all good soldiers with their rifles and mechanised vehicles on the battlefield."
In the proposal I'll be making for funding this weekend, I'll be suggesting a third way to the division in two outlined already above:
#investsec market only
#privacysensitive to #privacypositive approaches only, based on existing #it-#tech and related architectures
Why compromise on the original ideas?
The war in #ukraine is an imperative we must not ignore. It's one I choose not to. Thus we must deliver #intuition-enabling #tech ASAP.
#roi information available once an #nda is signed (not currently on this version of the deck).