GB 2 Earth Consulting vs Lab slide-deck

intuition-validation biotools vs bioweapons

1. Background

Recently, with others, I was working further on structuring the pre-discovery process for GB 2 Earth and its whole range of intuition-validation projects and workstreams, using the manual/hybrid principles of NewLean for the moment:

The overearching structure proposed would be flexible but firm. It would consist of a Core 1 of initial stakeholders for the foreseeable. Others would then not be able to integrate into the first stage at a later date. However, a closely integrated Core 2 would offer relevant participative rights and access which should not hinder the collaborations of future partners, corporations, governments, and related.

2. Proposed stakeholders

The proposals contemplate three different stakeholders:

1. The private investment function which would invest in the consultancy and ideas' broker company GB 2 Earth Consulting, perhaps to be located in the UK in a place yet to be determined, with the rights to license all the IP generated from now on in, including historical imagineering.

2. The security-agency sponsors and funders would conceivably get unlimited access to all the app, platform, architecture, device & chip proposals and implementations from this point onwards, including historical imagineering. This second group includes the related governments and so forth, and would constitute direct paying-clients as well as user-bases.

3. The tech partner-bases would include, to start with, one infrastructure-heavy big-tech partner only, and an already well-engaged top-tier AI corporation local to the proposed investment function.

3. My own role

Finally, in relation to my own role, this would be essentially two-part:

  1. Founder of GB 2 Earth Consulting, the consultancy and ideas' broker, perhapss located with UK government support in the UK at a location still to be determined.

  2. Carry out the role of a part-time PhD candidate at a university already comfortable with praxis-based study and ethnography.

    The subject of the PhD, still to be duly scoped by all relevant stakeholders, would potentially be intuition as a biotool not, here, as a bioweapon — with different applications relating to risk management, tracking and elimination (being one common denominator that could be extracted: such a focus would then include all the kinds of crime I've been discussing over recent years; but, also, things like climate change, water security, loopholes and a wider zemiology in the context of dark figure).

4. Suggested outcomes

What would ultimately be enabled as a result of all the previous is as follows:

What turns intuition validation as a biotool into intuition as a focussed bioweapon is what GB 2 Earth Lab would then proceed to scope, design, implement and supply on that covert side to those purely covert clients.

Further reading:

Below, you can click through to my recent blogpost on how to make the process of choosing ALL potential partners absolutely rigorous, professional, safe and secure in both near-term and long-term intuitionvalidation projects and workstreams — fundamentally by treating the latter exactly as if they were the most dangerous of bioweapons, which conceivably they may become:

Previous
Previous

GB 2 Earth_Consulting