GB 2 Earth Consulting vs Lab slide-deck
intuition-validation biotools vs bioweapons
1. Background
Recently, with others, I was working further on structuring the pre-discovery process for GB 2 Earth and its whole range of intuition-validation projects and workstreams, using the manual/hybrid principles of NewLean for the moment:
newlean.org (password protected — please request access)
The overearching structure proposed would be flexible but firm. It would consist of a Core 1 of initial stakeholders for the foreseeable. Others would then not be able to integrate into the first stage at a later date. However, a closely integrated Core 2 would offer relevant participative rights and access which should not hinder the collaborations of future partners, corporations, governments, and related.
2. Proposed stakeholders
The proposals contemplate three different stakeholders:
1. The private investment function which would invest in the consultancy and ideas' broker company GB 2 Earth Consulting, perhaps to be located in the UK in a place yet to be determined, with the rights to license all the IP generated from now on in, including historical imagineering.
2. The security-agency sponsors and funders would conceivably get unlimited access to all the app, platform, architecture, device & chip proposals and implementations from this point onwards, including historical imagineering. This second group includes the related governments and so forth, and would constitute direct paying-clients as well as user-bases.
3. The tech partner-bases would include, to start with, one infrastructure-heavy big-tech partner only, and an already well-engaged top-tier AI corporation local to the proposed investment function.
3. My own role
Finally, in relation to my own role, this would be essentially two-part:
Founder of GB 2 Earth Consulting, the consultancy and ideas' broker, perhapss located with UK government support in the UK at a location still to be determined.
Carry out the role of a part-time PhD candidate at a university already comfortable with praxis-based study and ethnography.
The subject of the PhD, still to be duly scoped by all relevant stakeholders, would potentially be intuition as a biotool — not, here, as a bioweapon — with different applications relating to risk management, tracking and elimination (being one common denominator that could be extracted: such a focus would then include all the kinds of crime I've been discussing over recent years; but, also, things like climate change, water security, loopholes and a wider zemiology in the context of dark figure).
4. Suggested outcomes
What would ultimately be enabled as a result of all the previous is as follows:
What turns intuition validation as a biotool into intuition as a focussed bioweapon is what GB 2 Earth Lab would then proceed to scope, design, implement and supply on that covert side to those purely covert clients.
Further reading:
Below, you can click through to my recent blogpost on how to make the process of choosing ALL potential partners absolutely rigorous, professional, safe and secure in both near-term and long-term intuitionvalidation projects and workstreams — fundamentally by treating the latter exactly as if they were the most dangerous of bioweapons, which conceivably they may become: